翻訳と辞書 |
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. : ウィキペディア英語版 | Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
''Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.'', 504 U.S. 451 (1992), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a lack of market power in the primary equipment market does not necessarily preclude antitrust liability for exclusionary conduct in derivative aftermarkets.〔Grady, Mark F. ''Cases and Materials on Antitrust''. UCLA Academic Publishing, 2011, p. 593.〕 ==Facts== Eastman Kodak manufactured and sold copying and micrographic equipment. In the early 1980s Independent Service Organizations (ISOs) began servicing Kodak equipment. Later, Kodak sought to take over servicing its own machines and limited the availability of Kodak replacement parts to the ISOs. The ISOs sued Kodak under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act for refusing to sell Kodak replacement parts to them. The district court granted Kodak's motion for summary judgment. The ISOs appealed, and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment for Kodak. Kodak appealed to the Supreme Court.〔Grady, pp. 591-92〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|